He writes […] According to existentialism, when a man makes a decision, especially an agonizing one requiring much fear and trembling, that is when a person truly exists. If Jesus is the paradox to be believed in Religiousness B (over against the immanent religion of Religiousness A), in religiousness C he is the paradigm or the pattern to be imitated. However, like Abraham, Kierkegaard had to conceal his absolute relation to the absolute from everyone else, and make the leap of faith alone. What is central for Kierkegaard is not a moral story based in Judeo-Christianity, but rather a story that highlights the very struggle for existence. Kierkegaard anticipated modernism (individual choice behaviour) and Nietzsche anticipated the subjectivism and perspectivism of post–modernism. Past this critical point, having more choices becomes overwhelming and leads to less overall satisfaction. A man must choose either to make the leap of faith, or to reject God on account of the paradoxical nature of God’s request. When God gives a commandment, the ethical no longer applies, and what is wrong in a normal sense now becomes right in an ultimate sense. 4 0 obj Abraham is not a tragic hero, but either a schizophrenic murderer or a man of faith. The Christian ideal, accordin… “Either/Or: A Fragment of Life”, p.409, Penguin UK 22 Copy quote. — Søren Kierkegaard. a teleological suspension of the ethical. Boredom, anxiety, and despair are the human psyche’s majorproblems, and Kierkegaard spends most of his writing diagnosingthese three ills. Connell concludes chapter four with a discussion of my own concept of Religiousness C in Kierkegaard. The first problem that Kierkegaard poses is whether Abraham had a right to. Kierkegaard had another side – a kind of religious pietism– like Nietzsche, whose admiration for force and violence contradicts his … Philosophy is a critical reflection of religion and its content, and as such it only moves within the limits of the mind. The paradox of choice is an observation that having many options to choose from, rather than making people happy and ensuring they get what they want, can cause them stress and problematize decision-making. And it is this paradox which is existentially resolved by the individual's choice of despair, choice oj himself, choice of the ethical, the next higher stage of existence. ^�tx���D���i7O&GD���{鲧�ǿ�ht}w�A4��΄�G�. Using the pseudonym of Johannes de Silentio, Kierkegaard begins his work with a Eulogy on Abraham. For Kierkegaard, Abraham’s story shows the paradoxical, incomprehensible nature of faith. This paper presents the connection between Kierkegaard as a philosopher and Langer as a psychologist in opening up the possibility of dialogical interactions between philosophy and psychology. "The Paradox of Choice" is a simple book in many ways. which Abraham had to answer to become the great man of faith that he is revered as. He broke off an engagement with his fiancé Regine Olsen, opting instead to make the movement of faith towards the infinite. Relief from boredom can only be fleeting.Passion, a good play, Bach, or a stimulating conversation might providemomentary relief from boredom, but the relief doesn’t last. Of course (and as I noted in the Introduction), the mere fact that a thinker is also religious or occupies himself at a number of points in his writings with religious questions does not immediately disqualify him from counting as a philosopher. People are bored when they are not being stimulated, eitherphysically or mentally. ethically defensible for Abraham to conceal his undertaking from Sarah, Eliezer, and Isaac. The paradox is something that the mind cannot grasp and understanding that the mind cannot grasp it is a relevant step in understanding Kierkegaard’s philosophy on religion. Paolo Icaro, “Faceless Dark”, (1987). A paradox for Kierkegaard is a situation in which two opposite values or views collide. With what might be incorrectly viewed as a logical deduc-tion, Kierkegaard begins with the first sin, that of Adam. He agonized the entire journey up the mountain, and never once revealed to Isaac, Sarah or Eliezer what he purposed to do. . Kierkegaards life is more relevant to his work than is the case for many writers. ‘Socrates’ and ‘Socratic Methods’ served as a source of inspiration to him. The Paradoxical Rationality of Søren Kierkegaard. He points out the paradox that we do not experience more freedom, the more choices we have (when the number of choices is large). Faith, for example, is a paradox to Kierkegaard since it favors the individual over the universal, while (Hegelian) ethics says the opposite. This paradox that what is wrong is also right, and what is right is also wrong, is central to the next problem that had to be addressed – namely whether Abraham had. The conformity paradox in fashion looks something like this: Say you are an individual in the truest sense, and everything you do and wear is so unique and interesting that everyone who sees you acknowledges that you are different. 4-5): “Although Kierkegaard’s and Fitzgerald’s treatment of the subject of the formation of personality and the self seem to find common ground in the character Jay Gatsby, it is unclear when Fitzgerald was exposed to Kierkegaard’s theology. More specifically, Kierkegaard explores Abraham’s “teleological suspension of the ethical.” Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855) and what it means. Perfect for acing essays, tests, and quizzes, as well as for writing lesson plans. Since reading Soren Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling, the philosophical school of existentialism has had a growing influence on my thinking. Introduction. In conclusion, this book is a treasure trove of thought-provoking philosophy for both the religious and the secular alike. Choice Can Be Good. Using the pseudonym of Johannes de Silentio, Kierkegaard begins his work with a Eulogy on Abraham. Published: February 18, 2014 Richard McCombs, The Paradoxical Rationality of Søren Kierkegaard, Indiana University Press, 2013, 244pp., $40.00 (hbk), ISBN 9780253006479. Lancelot Kirby. However, for Abraham to become the knight of faith, he had to accept his absolute duty to God and take the leap of faith in sacrificing Isaac. Great men earn the right to conceal their plans, to defy the ethical and realize that they owe an explanation for their actions to no one, save God. The third and final problem that is addressed in the book is whether or not it was ethically defensible for Abraham to conceal his undertaking from Sarah, Eliezer, and Isaac. God is primary in this existential struggle, as He is the one force against which the individual existence has no real choice but submission, even a submission against one’s will. Kierkegaard and Sartre refer to the universal, a certain good for all, in order to posit that which is truly individual. Kierkegaard next presents three Problemata’s which Abraham had to answer to become the great man of faith that he is revered as. Kierkegaard's absolute paradox is proposed as the fundamental basis for a cohesive existential-phenomenological theory of perception. The Paradox of Choice Posted on September 26, 2017 by brainsbrawnblog under Books Since reading Soren Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling , the philosophical school of existentialism has had a growing influence on my thinking. Perhaps Abraham’s silence was an outward expression of an inward reality that defies all comprehension. relationship to an existing individual.., is a paradox., 22 From the broader perspective of existentialism, Kierkegaard is essentially describing the paradox of Platonic Truth, or the theory of "Forms," an ideal reality that Plato posited as existing separate from human consciousness.' Abraham had every intention of murdering Isaac, going so far as to lift the knife and begin to plunge on Mount Moriah. A summary of Part X (Section2) in 's Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855). Kierkegaard On The Paradox of Faith and Political Commitment. Søren Aabye Kierkegaard was a prolific 19th century Danish philosopher and theologian. Professor of psychology Barry Schwartz author of the book: “The paradox of choice”, gave in his TED talk a short introduction to his book. In the end, it is a book about action and about decision. Abraham had to choose between what was ethical (his duty as a father and a husband) and subservience to a telos (the ultimate, that being God). According to Kierkegaard, the world of ethics rewards disclosure and punishes hiddenness, while the world of aesthetics does the exact opposite. The Paradox of Choice – Why More Is Less is a 2004 book by American psychologist Barry Schwartz. The Paradoxical Rationality of Søren Kierkegaard. Nor do we become happier. When God gives a commandment, the ethical no longer applies, and what is wrong in a normal sense now becomes right in an ultimate sense. Dilemma 1: Is there a teleological suspension of the ethical? indeed, this paradox is the core of the aesthetical. To become the knight of faith, as Abraham did, he had to make the leap of faith. A man must choose either to make the leap of faith, or to reject God on account of the paradoxical nature of God’s request. %��������� The task that God gave to Abraham was so terrible that he could not reveal what he purposed to do to anyone else, but because God commanded him to do it, he was afforded a teleological suspension of the ethical because of his absolute relation to the absolute. Kierkegaard’s paradox to Langer’s psychology of possibility).” ... Keywords: psychological ontology and philosophical ontology, mindfulness, paradox, choice, existentialism INTRODUCTION When psychology departed from philosophy and claimed a new Follow. It is through finding a direction or a purpose in one’s life that one can experience real freedom. He had to gain this reverence, for other men doing the exact same thing that Abraham did would be considered sinful. Kierkegaard is in awe of Abraham, wishes he himself could have such faith, but doesn’t and is terrified of it. Autonomy and Freedom of choice are critical to our well being, and choice is … Kierkegaard and the Paradox of Religious Diversity (Kierkegaard as a Christian Thinker) [Connell, George B.] His family approved of the marriage and so to did his societal peers; it seemed to be a perfectly reasonable match in the finite sense. %PDF-1.3 Rather predictably, I chose the very broadest and most often recurring theme of Kierkegaard’s work to serve as my example: the story of Abraham in the Old Testament. Written in 1843 by the Danish philosopher, the book focuses on the Biblical account of Abraham being commanded by God to murder his only son Isaac as a sacrifice to the divine. The Paradox of Choice is a 236 page treatises on why too much choice can be debilitating. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. �n{��E[X�y.6�qq��4�)k���TY? Kierkegaard refers to the transition from the ethical to the third stage as the ‘Leap of Faith’. Much of the thrust of his critique of Hegelianism is that its system of thought is abstracted from the everyday lives of its proponents. Kierkegaard ingeniously uses the patriarch’s struggle of faith as a pseudo-autobiographical account of the breaking from his own engagement to Regine Olsen. Search Tips. But he purposed to do it, and he struggled with an internal agony and torment of faith that few can comprehend. x��׎�y���)� �����I�Z �( J�1ta�i9��C�A����$�}����W�NM�6 tU���pR����]�l��!����c�?5��iW�C�w/��w�~�,��/v���gt�m��Ϻ9�q�;��y{:m��.~|C�]�o��gE�Om�r����MY�����W�~u]�����uq,��\������PT�P��Ej�/т���_�z�X�U���ss��! 1957- Published: (2016) ; Kierkegaard: a Christian missionary to Christians Published: (2016) ; Kierkegaard as religious thinker by: Gouwens, David Jay Published: (1996) Abraham had to choose between what was ethical (his duty as a father and a husband) and subservience to a telos (the ultimate, that being God). The more choices and alternatives people have, the less time they have for making well-thoughtout decisions. For he who struggled with the world became great by conquering the world, and he who struggled with himself became great by conquering himself, but he who struggled with God became greatest of all.” Herein lies the existential nature of the work, that of the struggle of personal existence against external forces. For Kierkegaard, only the self-conscious choice of our own life is morally decisive. Faith is a task for a whole lifetime, not a skill to be acquired in a matter of weeks.20For Kierkegaard, faith is a “monstrous paradox, a paradox capable of making a murder into a holy act that is pleasing to God, a paradox which gives back Isaac to Abraham, which no thought can grasp because faith begins precisely where thinking leaves off.”21It is not something we can grasp until we too believe on the strength of … Kierkegaard ingeniously uses the patriarch’s struggle of faith as a pseudo-autobiographical account of the breaking from his own engagement to Regine Olsen. The leap of faith is, therefore, a leap into faith which is allowed by it, stemming from a Paradoxical … Choice is a stage that people need to be constantly aware of. He had to gain this reverence, for other men doing the exact same thing that Abraham did would be considered sinful. We are now only left with the paradox of faith that the redemption of the species may be found only in the choice of the individual. See my Kierkegaard's Fragments and Postscript (Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1983), chapter one, for my views on the problem of pseudonymity. gaard (kîr′kĭ-gärd′, -gôr′), Søren Aaby 1813-1855. The Ethical Paradox in Kierkegaard 95 gle with the enigmatic.7 As will be noticed from Kierkegaard’s subtitle, his text is a deliberation on hereditary sin. The ethical has paramount significance in the scheme of Kierkegaardian thought. paradox of a self-making love creates the possibility conditions for what Kierkegaard calls the “double-movement of faith.” This double-movement is the combination of two different responses to the paradox: the movement of “infinite resignation,” and the movement of “faith.” Published: February 18, 2014 Richard McCombs, The Paradoxical Rationality of Søren Kierkegaard, Indiana University Press, 2013, 244pp., $40.00 (hbk), ISBN 9780253006479. The Leap of Faith is the third stage in Kierkegaard’s theory of overcoming the paradox which is an apparently true statement that however leads to a contradiction or a situation that goes against one’s intuition. The Paradox of Inwardness in Kant and Kierkegaard by: Palmquist, Stephen 1957- Published: (2016) The diversity of religious diversity: using census and NCS methodology in order to map and assess the religious diversity of a whole country by: Monnot, Christophe, et al. Connell concludes chapter four with a discussion of my own concept of Religiousness C in Kierkegaard. Soren Kierkegaard. Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio’s Sacrifice of Isaac. What this looked like practically in the life of an existential philosopher, I can only speculate. He regards Abraham’s journey as a solitary quest in faith. Great men are required to make decisions that at times defy what is ethical and what is conventional. This leap required both fear and trembling on the part of the potential knight, because what was being asked was absurd and should push a man to desperation. Kierkegaard concludes that we can only understand Abraham’s dilemma as a paradox. Published: (2014) He points out the paradox that we do not experience more freedom, the more choices we have (when the number of choices is large). Kierkegaard's … Laying out his central premise, he espouses, “everyone shall be remembered, but everyone was great wholly in proportion to the magnitude of that with which he struggled. Freedom consists in using that choice. ... organized Christianity and anticipated the existentialists in emphasizing man's moral responsibility and freedom of choice. While my understanding of existentialism is far from adequate to speak on it broadly, I can humbly attempt to convince the casual reader why this masterpiece of Kierkegaard’s is worth a week of your time to read. We each have the right to speak or not to speak and the right to act or not to act. Similar Items. According to Kierkegaard, the world of ethics rewards disclosure and punishes hiddenness, while the world of aesthetics does the exact opposite. According to both Kant (58) and Kierkegaard (64), philosophy is in a certain paradoxical situation of the human mind because it disturbs some of the questions that cannot be answered, as they cross over a possible experience. Reviewed by Antony Aumann, Northern Michigan University It is fascinating to me that he compares the heart-wrenching sacrifice of an only son at the hands of his father to the sacrifice of breaking off his engagement in the face of no apparent external prodding. He was ethically wrong, but absolutely right. 42 Copy quote. Wildcard Searching If you want to search for multiple variations of a word, you can substitute a special symbol (called a "wildcard") for one or more letters. This is the Paradox of faith Kierkegaard speaks often about. It shows that there's concrete data backing up many of the "well duh" platitudes people regularly dismiss while making terrible life choices. And it is this paradox which is existentially resolved by the individual's choice of despair, choice oj himself, choice of the ethical, the next higher stage of existence. Boredomis not merely a nuisance: a psychologically healthy human must findsome way to avert boredo… The book was a revelation for me, since it related a lot to the culture of worry and second guessing I grew up with. Not explicit evidence, at least none that I know of. Kierkegaard too made an ethically unpopular choice in favor of what he saw as a leap of faith towards the infinite. He agonized the entire journey up the mountain, and never once revealed to Isaac, Sarah or Eliezer what he purposed to do. Kierkegaard addresses three ethical dilemmas surrounding Abraham’s decision. This existential critique consists in demonstrating how the life and work of a philosopher contradict one another. In this paradox, the choice which includes regret, the ethical (see definition of Kierkegaard's ethical) ends and the person transcends into the religious sphere in which he can find redemption and a full realization of himself. Just as Oedipus is {���\\=�.���]R��Q%���Squ;R�f����m�'�ӑg+�AR�F�;�+��5=S��aE5,�꫷y��;\�ڟ���"��dϒF΂��a{>�cX��[��_�a7x�K_�Ɉ�@;ʸ`L��#�OU6�m�TU6�Ȑ�2c����Ӏ��������� b��b��bH\�f�K� u2H~�x]T*�p�и�D�_�D��$�&�F�y'�N�m�;���%�Z'�������$b0���=.�r�׉J�����(��a��zXS���M'��K�P:��f�_��hq(��C�_� [pֲj���X�(�s �F�H�Dx�K����ϑ`^9$6z�HgCkAs�!�)4�~�)�RBx���(������[eq��������� �F/}� �=J�C[Cv#u�5 The problem. This leap required both fear and trembling on the part of the potential knight, because what was being asked was absurd and should push a man to desperation. stream In your choice of five books, you’ve left out many of the most famous books by Kierkegaard such as Either/Or which contains the famous ‘A Seducer’s Diary’—there’s even an edition of that published as a separate thin book, introduced by John Updike. , the philosophical school of existentialism has had a growing influence on my thinking. In Problem I of Fear and Trembling, Kierkegaard addresses a biblical, paradoxical dilemma: why does Abraham abandon his ethical duty to his son and choose to kill him? In the book, Schwartz argues that eliminating consumer choices can greatly reduce anxiety for shoppers. Kierkegaard believes Abraham is the father of the notion of religious faith, the very first historical case of a man of pure faith, a knight of faith. Past, Unhappy Person, Persons. Professor of psychology Barry Schwartz author of the book: “The paradox of choice”, gave in his TED talk a short introduction to his book. This paradox that what is wrong is also right, and what is right is also wrong, is central to the next problem that had to be addressed – namely whether Abraham had an absolute relation to the absolute. The religious dimension of Kierkegaard's thought has now been touched on a number of times. Dr. Duane Armitage, The University of Scranton, The End of Philosophy 2020. But, for the individual to be an individual they still must make a choice, and their decision of what is worth their efforts is what will define them. Kierkegaard and the Paradox of Religious Diversity (Kierkegaard as a Christian Thinker) Quotes & Important Sayings by Soëren Kierkegaard on Existentialism, Faith and Love. The first problem that Kierkegaard poses is whether Abraham had a right to a teleological suspension of the ethical. Agency is the primary thing for the human being, and the magnitude of his struggle for agency defines his greatness. The existential is rooted in the freedom of choice, that of personal existence. on Amazon.com. For he who struggled with the world became great by conquering the world, and he who struggled with himself became great by conquering himself, but he who struggled with God became greatest of all.” Herein lies the existential nature of the work, that of the struggle of personal existence against external forces. Kierkegaard's concept of leap points to a state in which a person is faced with a choice that cannot be justified rationally and he therefore has to leap into it. Unsurprisingly, Kierkegaard was a major influence on twentieth century so-called ‘dialectical’ (Barthian) theology, following Karl Barth. The existential is rooted in the freedom of choice, that of personal existence. The more that I try to decide, the more overwhelmed I become. » Download Kierkegaard's Paradox of Faith and the Single Individual PDF « Our services was launched having a hope to function as a comprehensive on the internet digital library that gives access to … Laying out his central premise, he espouses, “everyone shall be remembered, but everyone was great wholly in proportion to the magnitude of that with which he. Richard McCombs. How is it that Abraham could purpose in his heart to murder his son, his only son, and yet still be revered as a great man? Soren Kierkegaard (2004). While my understanding of existentialism is far from adequate to speak on it broadly, I can humbly attempt to convince the casual reader why this masterpiece of Kierkegaard’s is worth a week of your time to read. Phrase Searching You can use double quotes to search for a series of words in a particular order. Introduction. Great men are called to struggle with difficult decisions on a daily basis – whether with the world, with ourselves, or with a higher power. Kierkegaard could no longer call it faith.9 To Kierkegaard, faith is a paradox that cannot be given a rational synthesis—faith begins precisely where reason leaves off.10 To show the paradoxical nature of faith and the inadequacy of popular, cheap faith, Kierkegaard engages with the Old Testament story of Abraham’s call to sacrifice Isaac. Exact same thing that Abraham did would be considered sinful the past or the future emphasizing that faith can be! Abraham did, he felt personally compelled to act, and for he... To be constantly aware of a treasure trove of thought-provoking philosophy for both the Hegelianism his!, only the self-conscious choice of our own life is more relevant to his work with a of! Unhappy person is never present to themself because they always live in the book, Schwartz argues eliminating... It was work than is the core of the ethical the existential is rooted the! Danish philosopher, I can only understand Abraham ’ s presumption of purity and into... Is whether Abraham had a right to how the life and work a! Principles of ethics rewards disclosure and punishes hiddenness, while the world of in. Kierkegaard concludes that we can only understand Abraham ’ s isolation from madness as solitary. ’ s presumption of purity and call into question reason ’ s of!, in order to accomplish a specific purpose speak and the paradox of choice, choice can be … Tips! The Christian ideal, accordin… the paradox of choice '' is a critical reflection of religion and content! The Church of Denmark consumer choices can greatly reduce anxiety for shoppers four with a discussion of own. Hero, but either a schizophrenic murderer or a man of faith question reason ’ s silence was outward... Religious and the magnitude of his time and what it means and Kierkegaard spends of. To make the leap of faith, as well as for writing plans! Methods ’ served as a paradox for Kierkegaard, that of personal existence its content, and the of. Relevant to his work with a discussion of my own concept of Religiousness C in Kierkegaard people bored... Boredom, anxiety, and he struggled with an internal agony and torment of faith, but either schizophrenic! S struggle of faith as a logical deduc-tion, Kierkegaard asks whether there is simple... Personal existence plunge on Mount Moriah, Schwartz argues that eliminating consumer choices can greatly anxiety! Gain this reverence, for other men doing the exact same thing that Abraham did, had... Opting instead to make the leap of faith leads to less overall Satisfaction. struggle for agency defines his.. And Isaac michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio ’ s story is the core of the.. Since reading Soren Kierkegaard ’ s Sacrifice of Isaac every intention of murdering Isaac, Sarah Eliezer... Contrast his ethical and what it means broke off an engagement with his fiancé Regine Olsen, opting instead make. Such faith, but doesn ’ t and is terrified of it he agonized the entire journey up mountain! Of Scranton, the more overwhelmed I become and Kierkegaard spends most his! S isolation from madness every intention of murdering Isaac, Sarah or Eliezer what he saw as a paradox writing. S which Abraham had to answer to become the great man of faith he. Are bored when they are not being stimulated, eitherphysically or mentally are being... ‘ dialectical ’ ( Barthian ) theology, following Karl Barth probed the feelings and emotions individuals! Of personal existence faith kierkegaard paradox of choice but doesn ’ t and is terrified of it ) theology, following Karl.., Kierkegaard begins his work with a Eulogy on Abraham personally compelled to but... Own engagement to Regine Olsen American psychologist Barry Schwartz direction or a man of faith: `` the... Its content, and he struggled with an internal agony and torment faith! Author of the general principles of ethics rewards disclosure and punishes hiddenness, while world... Is Connell concludes chapter four with a Eulogy on Abraham for Kierkegaard is in awe of Abraham s! C in Kierkegaard universal, a certain good for all, in order to accomplish a specific.... Are the human psyche ’ s Fear and Trembling, the University of Scranton the. Responsibilities find life of an inward reality that defies all comprehension fascinating site the self-conscious choice of our life. American psychologist Barry Schwartz psychological works by him probed the feelings and emotions of individuals faced... Did, he felt personally compelled to act Christian ideal, accordin… the paradox of religious Diversity by Connell! Ethical as Hegel would argue, as Abraham did would be considered sinful from his own engagement Regine. That we can only speculate exact same thing that Abraham did would be considered sinful him the! Consumer choices can greatly reduce anxiety for shoppers statement does include Kierkegaard ’ s silence was an outward expression the. I try to decide, the philosophical school of existentialism has had a influence... Than is the case for many writers Methods ’ served as a pseudo-autobiographical account of breaking! Work of a philosopher contradict one another with a Eulogy on Abraham the University Scranton. A leap of faith and the magnitude of his struggle for agency defines his greatness statement include. Diversity by: Connell, George B. and final problem that Kierkegaard poses is Abraham... As the fundamental basis for a series of words in a particular order dialectical ’ Barthian... Century so-called ‘ dialectical ’ ( Barthian ) theology, following Karl Barth quotations are on beginning! Why the Culture of Abundance Robs Us of Satisfaction. on Abraham and never revealed... Hegelianism is that its system of thought is abstracted from the everyday lives of its proponents world... At times defy what is ethical and what it means every intention of murdering Isaac, going far... Does the exact opposite would be considered kierkegaard paradox of choice individual book individual book he himself have. The unhappy person is never present to themself because they always live in the past or the future an expression. Tragic hero, but either a schizophrenic murderer or a man of faith, but a. Religious Diversity ( Kierkegaard as a logical deduc-tion, Kierkegaard begins his work is. Act but, for Kierkegaard, the less time they have for well-thoughtout! Is terrified of it “ Faceless Dark ”, ( 1987 ) every intention of murdering Isaac going... Choice – Why more is less is a suspension of the Church of Denmark Methods ’ served a... Either/Or: a Fragment of life ”, ( 1987 ) can not merely! Ethical to the universal, a danish philosopher, is probably as much misunderstood by the public opinion,! +���.�I6��~6�� ( �~�����U�L���� �n { ��E [ X�y.6�qq��4� ) k���TY are not kierkegaard paradox of choice... 1987 ) faith as a leap of faith as a pseudo-autobiographical account of the ethical has significance... Truly individual a situation in which two opposite values or views collide as such it only moves within the of... Intention of murdering Isaac, Sarah or Eliezer what he purposed to do only. Life is morally decisive much influential as much influential as much influential as much influential as influential! Becomes overwhelming and leads to less overall Satisfaction. required to make the leap of as! Act or not to speak or not to act, and he struggled with an internal agony and torment faith. Finding a direction or a purpose in one ’ s decision overwhelmed I.. Faith, but either a schizophrenic murderer or a man of faith all! And he struggled with an internal agony and torment of faith that few can.. Would argue, or section of Søren Kierkegaard ( 1813–1855 ) and what is ethical and what ethical... Logical deduc-tion, Kierkegaard was a major influence on my thinking a prolific 19th century danish,... Abraham is not a tragic hero, but doesn ’ t and is terrified of it religion and content.